Background

The observational Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED) study found 40% of older people attending for care to be living with frailty. Older people with frailty have poorer outcomes from emergency care. Current best practice calls for early identification of frailty and holistic multidisciplinary assessment. This survey of FEED sites explores variations in frailty-attuned service definitions and provision.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey included study sites across Europe identified through snowball recruitment. Site co-ordinators (healthcare professionals in emergency and geriatric care) were surveyed online using Microsoft Forms. Items covered department and hospital capacity, frailty and delirium identification methods, staffing, and frailty-focused healthcare services in the ED. Descriptive statistics were reported.

Results

A total of 68 sites from 17 countries participated. Emergency departments had median 30 (IQR 21-53) trolley spaces. Most defined “older people” by age 65+ (64%) or 75+ (25%). Frailty screening was used at 69% of sites and mandated at 38%. Night-time staffing was lower compared to day-time for nursing (10 [IQR 8-14] vs. 14 [IQR 10-18]) and physicians (5 [IQR 3-8] vs. 10 [IQR 7-15]). Most sites had provision for ED frailty specialist services by day, but these services were rarely available at night. Sites mostly had accessible facilities; however, hot meals were rarely available at night (18%).

Conclusion

This survey demonstrated variability in case definitions, screening practices, and frailty-attuned service provision. There is no unanimous definition for older age, and while the Clinical Frailty Scale was commonly used, this was rarely mandated or captured in electronic records. Frailty services were often unavailable overnight. Appreciation of the variation in frailty service models could inform operational configuration and workforce development.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Overview publication

TitleService provision for Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED): a survey of operational characteristics.
DateJuly 29th, 2024
Issue nameScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
Issue numberv32.1:64
DOI10.1186/s13049-024-01234-w
PubMed39075591
AuthorsFehlmann CA, Mc Loughlin K, Cosgriff EJ, Ferrick JF & van Oppen JD
InfoEuropean Taskforce for Geriatric Emergency Medicine, Coats T, Conroy S, de Groot B, Heeren P, Lim S, Lucke J, Mooijaart S, Nickel CH, Penfold R, Singler K, Heeren P, Steenebruggen F, Sterckx V, Brdar I, Libicherová P, Balen F, Bianco C, Dubucs X, Guenezan J, Apfelbacher S, Fraidakis O, Fyntanidou V, Gaál S, Jónsdóttir AB, Cremin M, Kelly M, McAteer C, Moloney E, Sankey C, Sibthorpe L, Zazzara MB, Camilleri RA, Zammit P, Coffeng SM, Lucke J, Smits R, Bordigoni MAR, Castejón-Hernández S, Del Rocio Coronel Chumbi L, Mir SA, Padilla EE, Rojewski-Rojas W, Fadini D, Jegerlehner NS, Nickel CH, Zucconi E, Demir HA, Dundar ZD, Güven R, Karamercan MA, Kose F, Söğüt Ö, Tayfur I, Abbott L, Adams J, Bernardo J, Brown L, Burton J, Claassen R, Cooper J, Heyes R, Lightbody C, Masoli J, Mawhinney D, McKenzie S, Moultrie N, Price A, Raman R, Rajasingam A, Rothwell L, Shashikala RP, Smith E, Sorice V, van Oppen J, Wallace J, Young T
KeywordsDelirium, Emergency care, Frailty, Health services
Read Read publication