Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) affects ∼20% of older surgical patients. It is associated with poor clinical outcome and increased mortality. We aimed to identify the major POD risk factors and to develop and validate a multivariate algorithm for individual POD risk prediction and risk evaluation in the very early postoperative period.

Methods

BioCog is a prospective cohort study conducted in the anaesthesiology departments of two tertiary care centres in Germany and The Netherlands. Patients aged ≥65 yr with no preoperative dementia (Mini-Mental Status Examination ≥24) undergoing surgery with an expected duration of at least 60 min were enrolled and screened for POD according to DSM 5 until the seventh postoperative day. Clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging data, and blood were measured before and after surgery. We evaluated several models by sequentially adding blocks of variables. Gradient-boosted trees (GBT) with nested cross-validation were used for POD prediction. Model accuracy (area under the receiver-operating curve, AUC) and calibration were assessed (Brier score).

Results

Out of 929 patients, 184 (20%) experienced POD. A GBT algorithm using both preoperative data, characteristics of the intervention, and postoperative changes in laboratory parameters achieved the highest AUC (0.83, [0.79-0.86]) with a Brier score of 0.12 (0.12-0.13).

Conclusions

Models combining preoperative with precipitating factors during surgery predict POD with high accuracy. This suggests that the resulting algorithms eventually may become useful to support clinical decision-making.

Clinical trial registration

NCT02265263.

Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Overview publication

TitlePrediction and risk evaluation of delirium after surgery in older patients: development and internal validation of an algorithm from the prospective BioCog cohort study.
DateMay 1st, 2026
Issue nameBritish journal of anaesthesia
Issue numberv136.5:1495-1508
DOI10.1016/j.bja.2026.01.025
PubMed41850989
AuthorsLammers-Lietz F, Akyuez L, Boraschi D, Borchers F, de Bresser J, Chatterjee S, Correia MM, de Lange NM, Dschietzig TB, Ghosh S, Feinkohl I, Ferreira da Silva I, Fislage M, Fournier A, Gallinat J, Hadzidiakos D, Hädel S, Halzl-Yürek F, Heilmann-Heimbach S, Heinrich M, Hendrikse J, Hoffmann P, Janke J, Kant IMJ, Kraft A, Krause R, Kruppa-Scheetz J, Kühn S, Lachmann G, Laubach M, Lippert C, Menon DK, Mörgeli R, Müller A, Mutsaerts HJ, Nöthen M, Nürnberg P, Ofosu K, Pietzsch M, Piper SK, Pischon T, Preller J, Scheurer K, Schneider R, Scholtz K, Schreier PH, Slooter AJC, Stamatakis EA, von Haefen C, van Montfort SJT, van Dellen E, Volk HD, Weber S, Wiebach J, Wiehe A, Winterer JM, Wolf A, Zacharias N, Spies C & Winterer G
Keywordscohort study, neuroimaging, postoperative complications, postoperative delirium, risk factors, transcriptome
Read Read publication