Background

Epigenetic clocks use DNA methylation (DNAm) levels of specific sets of CpG dinucleotides to accurately predict individual chronological age. A popular application of these clocks is to explore whether the deviation of predicted age from chronological age is associated with disease phenotypes, where this deviation is interpreted as a potential biomarker of biological age. This wide application, however, contrasts with the limited insight in the processes that may drive the running of epigenetic clocks.

Results

We perform a functional genomics analysis on four epigenetic clocks, including Hannum’s blood predictor and Horvath’s multi-tissue predictor, using blood DNA methylome and transcriptome data from 3132 individuals. The four clocks result in similar predictions of individual chronological age, and their constituting CpGs are correlated in DNAm level and are enriched for similar histone modifications and chromatin states. Interestingly, DNAm levels of CpGs from the clocks are commonly associated with gene expression in trans. The gene sets involved are highly overlapping and enriched for T cell processes. Further analysis of the transcriptome and methylome of sorted blood cell types identifies differences in DNAm between naive and activated T and NK cells as a probable contributor to the clocks. Indeed, within the same donor, the four epigenetic clocks predict naive cells to be up to 40 years younger than activated cells.

Conclusions

The ability of epigenetic clocks to predict chronological age involves their ability to detect changes in proportions of naive and activated immune blood cells, an established feature of immuno-senescence. This finding may contribute to the interpretation of associations between clock-derived measures and age-related health outcomes.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Overview publication

TitleFunctional genomics analysis identifies T and NK cell activation as a driver of epigenetic clock progression.
DateJanuary 14th, 2022
Issue nameGenome biology
Issue numberv23.1:24
DOI10.1186/s13059-021-02585-8
PubMed35031073
AuthorsJonkman TH, Dekkers KF, Slieker RC, Grant CD, Ikram MA, van Greevenbroek MMJ, Franke L, Veldink JH, Boomsma DI, Slagboom PE, Consortium BIOS & Heijmans BT
Read Read publication