Senescence associated-beta-galactosidase (SA-beta-gal) activity is a widely used marker for cellular senenescence. SA-beta-gal activity is routinely detected cytochemically, manually discriminating negative from positive cells. This method is time-consuming, subjective and therefore prone to operator-error. We aimed to optimize a flow cytometric method described by other workers using endothelial cells to better differentiate between populations of fibroblasts in degrees of SA-beta-gal activity. Skin fibroblasts were isolated from young (mean age +/- SD: 25.5 +/- 1.8) and very old (age 90.2 +/- 0.3) subjects. Different pH modulators were tested for toxicity. To induce stress-induced senescence, fibroblasts were exposed to rotenone. Senescence was assessed measuring SA-beta-gal activity by cytochemistry (X-gal) and by flow cytometry (C(12)FDG). The pH modulator Bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1) was found to be least toxic for fibroblasts and to differentiate best between nonstressed and stressed fibroblast populations. Under nonstressed conditions, fibroblasts from very old subjects showed higher SA-beta-gal activity than fibroblasts from young subjects. This difference was found for both the flow cytometric and cytochemical methods (P = 0.013 and P = 0.056 respectively). Under stress-induced conditions the flow cytometric method but not the cytochemical method revealed significant higher SA-beta-gal activity in fibroblasts from very old compared to young subjects (P = 0.004 and P = 0.635 respectively). We found the modified flow cytometric method measuring SA-beta-gal activity superior in discriminating between degrees of senescence in different populations of fibroblasts.

Copyright 2009 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Overview publication

TitleRapid flow cytometric method for measuring senescence associated beta-galactosidase activity in human fibroblasts.
DateNovember 1st, 2009
Issue nameCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology
Issue numberv75.11:910-6
DOI10.1002/cyto.a.20796
PubMed19777541
AuthorsNoppe G, Dekker P, de Koning-Treurniet C, Blom J, van Heemst D, Dirks RW, Tanke HJ, Westendorp RG & Maier AB
Read Read publication