Background

Aging is a multifactorial process that affects multiple tissues and is characterized by changes in homeostasis over time, leading to increased morbidity. Whole blood gene expression signatures have been associated with aging and have been used to gain information on its biological mechanisms, which are still not fully understood. However, blood is composed of many cell types whose proportions in blood vary with age. As a result, previously observed associations between gene expression levels and aging might be driven by cell type composition rather than intracellular aging mechanisms. To overcome this, previous aging studies already accounted for major cell types, but the possibility that the reported associations are false positives driven by less prevalent cell subtypes remains.

Results

Here, we compared the regression model from our previous work to an extended model that corrects for 33 additional white blood cell subtypes. Both models were applied to whole blood gene expression data from 3165 individuals belonging to the general population (age range of 18-81 years). We evaluated that the new model is a better fit for the data and it identified fewer genes associated with aging (625, compared to the 2808 of the initial model; P ≤ 2.5⨯10-6). Moreover, 511 genes (~ 18% of the 2808 genes identified by the initial model) were found using both models, indicating that the other previously reported genes could be proxies for less abundant cell types. In particular, functional enrichment of the genes identified by the new model highlighted pathways and GO terms specifically associated with platelet activity.

Conclusions

We conclude that gene expression analyses in blood strongly benefit from correction for both common and rare blood cell types, and recommend using blood-cell count estimates as standard covariates when studying whole blood gene expression.

Overview publication

TitleCorrection for both common and rare cell types in blood is important to identify genes that correlate with age.
DateMarch 15th, 2021
Issue nameBMC genomics
Issue numberv22.1:184
DOI10.1186/s12864-020-07344-w
PubMed33722199
AuthorsPellegrino-Coppola D, Claringbould A, Stutvoet M, Boomsma DI, Ikram MA, Slagboom PE, Westra HJ & Franke L
InfoBIOS Consortium, Heijmans BT, 't Hoen PAC, van Meurs J, Isaacs A, Jansen R, Franke L, Boomsma DI, Pool R, van Dongen J, Hottenga JJ, van Greevenbroek MMJ, Stehouwer CDA, van der Kallen CJH, Schalkwijk CG, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova S, Tigchelaar EF, Slagboom PE, Beekman M, Deelen J, van Heemst D, Veldink JH, van den Berg LH, van Duijn CM, Hofman BA, Uitterlinden AG, Jhamai PM, Verbiest M, Suchiman HED, Verkerk M, van der Breggen R, van Rooij J, Lakenberg N, Mei H, van Iterson M, van Galen M, Bot J, Zhernakova DV, van 't Hof P, Deelen P, Nooren I, Moed M, Vermaat M, Luijk R, Bonder MJ, van Dijk F, Arindrarto W, Kielbasa SM, Swertz MA, van Zwet EW, 't Hoen PB
KeywordsAging, Cell counts correction, Gene expression, Platelet activity, Whole blood
Read Read publication