Background

Very few older people with severe hearing loss use hearing aids to reduce the negative consequences of reduced hearing in daily functioning.

Aim

Assessment of a screening test and a standardised auditory rehabilitation programme for older people from the general population with untreated severe hearing loss.

Design of study

Intervention study and qualitative exploration.

Setting

Leiden 85-Plus Study, a prospective population-based study of 85-year-old inhabitants of Leiden, the Netherlands.

Method

Hearing loss was measured by pure-tone audiometry in 454 subjects aged 85 years. Subjects with hearing loss above 35 dB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz who did not use hearing aids were invited to participate in a standardised programme for auditory rehabilitation. In-depth interviews were held with participants to explore arguments for participating in this programme.

Results

Of the 367 participants with severe hearing loss (prevalence = 81%), 66% (241/367) did not use a hearing aid. Three out of four of these participants (n = 185) declined participation in the auditory rehabilitation programme. The most common reason given for not participating was the subjects’ feeling that their current hearing loss did not warrant the use of a hearing aid. Subjects who participated in the programme were found to suffer from more severe hearing loss and experienced more hearing disability. Those who did not participate in the programme felt they could cope with their disabilities and considered a hearing aid unnecessary.

Conclusion

Untreated hearing loss is prevalent among older people from the general population. The majority of older people decline auditory rehabilitation. For these people the use of a hearing aid is not perceived as necessary in order to function on a daily basis. Older people who have expected benefits from a hearing aid have already obtained them, marginalising the benefits of a rehabilitation (and screening) programme.

Overview publication

TitleAuditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population–the Leiden 85-plus study.
DateJuly 1st, 2003
Issue nameThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Issue numberv53.492:536-40
PubMed14694666
AuthorsGussekloo J, de Bont LE, von Faber M, Eekhof JA, de Laat JA, Hulshof JH, van Dongen E & Westendorp RG
Read Read publication